Suriname Excavators logo
Suriname Excavators
Side-by-side comparison · medium crawler

Kobelco SK350 vs Komatsu PC360

35t Kobelco vs 36t Komatsu — full spec showdown, application fit, and our recommendation by project type.

35t / 36t
Operating weight
220 / 226 hp
Engine power
1 / 1
Configurations
3 / 3
Applications
Visual comparison

Side-by-side spec bars

Operating weight
SK35035t
PC36036t
Engine power
SK350220 hp
PC360226 hp
Max dig depth
SK3507.40 m
PC3608.00 m
Max reach
SK35010.80 m
PC36011.50 m
Bucket capacity
SK3501.50 m³
PC3601.6 m³

Overview

The Kobelco SK350 and Komatsu PC360 sit in the same medium crawler class, separated by 1.0 tonnes of operating weight. They sit in different brand tiers (Kobelco in mid, Komatsu in premium), which is the single biggest factor in how they'll behave over a 5-year ownership cycle.

Kobelco SK350 buyers across our Caribbean and African service area typically choose it for 35t quarry primary and mining-feeder duty. Komatsu PC360 buyers, by contrast, tend to prioritise 36-tonne quarry primary and mining feeder. The two machines have meaningful overlap on heavy civil works, quarry primary loading, mining feeder, so a buyer with that application profile genuinely has a choice to make — and it's worth understanding the trade-offs in depth before committing.

Brand positioning

Kobelco positioning

Kobelco specialises in long-reach and demolition configurations. The SK-series standard mid-class is competitive but not category-leading; the Kobelco edge shows up in specialty applications.

Komatsu positioning

Komatsu is the segment's fuel-efficiency leader and a close second to Caterpillar on global parts availability. The SAA engine family delivers consistently better real-world fuel consumption than competing premium engines.

What the tier difference means in practice

A Korean-tier machine vs a premium-tier machine typically differs across four dimensions over a 5-year ownership cycle: upfront capex (premium ~25-40% higher than value), fuel efficiency (premium ~5-10% better), parts availability (premium consistently 1-3 weeks faster on major components), and resale-value retention at year five (premium ~15-25 percentage points higher). On total cost of ownership the gap is typically much smaller than the upfront spread suggests — but cash-flow profiles differ significantly.

5-year total cost of ownership

Across a 5-year ownership cycle at typical African construction-sector use (2,000 operating hours/year, $1.20/L diesel, financed 50%), the Kobelco SK350 typically delivers a total 5-year operating cost of $510-580k including acquisition, fuel, parts, service, financing interest, and resale recovery. The Komatsu PC360 comes in at $580-650k.

Acquisition (financed): Kobelco SK350 ~$130-175k, Komatsu PC360 ~$160-220k. That value gap of 25-40% on day one is the largest single line item driving short-term cash-flow differences.

Fuel over 5 years: Both machines burn 20-30 L/h on standard duty. Across 10,000 lifetime operating hours that's $240-360k of diesel. The Komatsu PC360 typically delivers 5-10% better real-world fuel economy than competing mid-class machines, saving $12-36k over the cycle.

Parts + service: Korean-tier parts run ~$10-14k/year for the Kobelco SK350. Premium-tier parts run ~$14-18k/year for the Komatsu PC360.

Resale at year 5: Kobelco typically holds 32-42% of acquisition price after 5 years. Komatsu holds 45-55%. The resale gap is often the largest single TCO swing factor — premium-tier machines effectively rebate 15-25% more capital at year five.

Parts logistics & service support

Kobelco parts logistics for Kobelco SK350

Kobelco specialised dealer presence — strongest for long-reach and demolition configurations. Fast-moving parts 5-10 days; major components 3-5 weeks.

Komatsu parts logistics for Komatsu PC360

Komatsu direct dealers across South Africa, Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana, and Nigeria. Strong East African parts logistics in particular. Fast-moving parts within 48-96 hours; major components 2-3 weeks.

What this means in practice

Mining and infrastructure operations across Caribbean and African markets typically lose $2-5k per hour of unscheduled downtime — meaning a single 24-hour parts delay can cost more than the parts themselves. Choose the brand with the strongest parts logistics in your destination country and operating sector.

Configurations available

Kobelco SK350 configurations available

  • SK350 (standard) — Standard production configuration

Komatsu PC360 configurations available

  • PC360 (standard) — Standard production configuration

Configuration choice (undercarriage track pattern, bucket capacity, hydraulic-circuit options, cab certification) drives 30%+ of total cost of ownership over a 5-year cycle. Whichever model you choose, specify configuration to the buyer's actual operating profile before order — retrofitting later costs 30-50% more.

Specs

Side-by-side spec table

FeatureKobelco SK350Komatsu PC360
Operating weight35 tonnes36 tonnes
Engine powerYanmar Tier 4 Final — 220 hpKomatsu SAA6D170E-5 — 226 hp
Bucket capacity1.50 m³1.6 m³
Max dig depth7.40 m8.00 m
Max reach10.80 m11.50 m
Weight classmedium crawlermedium crawler
Configurations1 variant1 variant
Which to choose

Recommendation by project profile

Applications

Where each model excels

Kobelco SK350 applications
  • Heavy civil works
  • Quarry primary loading
  • Mining feeder
Komatsu PC360 applications
  • Heavy civil works
  • Quarry primary loading
  • Mining feeder
Availability

Both models available across our service area

Frequently asked

Buyer questions

Which is better — Kobelco SK350 or Komatsu PC360?

Neither is universally better — they target slightly different operating profiles. The Kobelco SK350 is best for 35t quarry primary and mining-feeder duty. The Komatsu PC360 is best for 36-tonne quarry primary and mining feeder. Choose the one that matches your operating priority — the wrong choice for your duty cycle will cost more over 5 years than the right choice would have saved on upfront price.

What's the price difference between the Kobelco SK350 and Komatsu PC360?

Pricing depends on destination country, configuration, and FX at order time. Contact our team with your country and required configuration for binding quotes on both models. Typically the Komatsu PC360 commands a ~25-40% premium over the Kobelco SK350 on day one.

How long does delivery of either to Caribbean and Africa take?

Both models ship from manufacturer facilities to our regional warehouse and on to the destination country. Caribbean lead times typically 2-5 weeks; African lead times 5-10 weeks depending on port and customs efficiency.

Do you offer financing for the Kobelco SK350 and Komatsu PC360?

Yes. Both Kobelco and Komatsu machines can be financed via manufacturer-backed credit programmes (where applicable), regional commercial bank facilities, or lease-to-own structures. Typical terms are 24-60 months. Indicative terms returned within 5 business days of receiving project documentation.

Which holds better resale value — Kobelco SK350 or Komatsu PC360?

Komatsu PC360 typically holds significantly better resale value at year 5 — premium-tier machines retain ~45-55% of acquisition price vs ~25-35% for value-tier alternatives. This resale gap is usually the largest single TCO swing factor over 5 years.

What configurations should I specify for Kobelco SK350 or Komatsu PC360 in mining operations?

For mining and quarry duty on either model, specify: reinforced undercarriage, rock-pattern track shoes (700mm+), oversized rock bucket, hydraulic breaker hydraulic circuit, premium air filtration. Order at point of sale — retrofitting these costs 30-50% more.

Are parts readily available for the Kobelco SK350 and Komatsu PC360 across Africa?

Yes — both brands have meaningful African dealer presence. Kobelco fast-moving parts typically 5-10 days; Komatsu fast-moving parts 24-72 hours. We hold both brands' inventory in our regional warehouse for fast supply.

Can I get an operator trained on the Kobelco SK350 or Komatsu PC360?

Yes. Every major-class machine sale includes operator training as standard. Manufacturer-certified training is also available through Kobelco and Komatsu dealer networks in most major Caribbean and African markets.

Continue comparing

Related head-to-head comparisons

Cite this page
APA
Suriname Excavators. (2026). Kobelco SK350 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison. Retrieved 10 June 2026, from https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/kobelco-sk350-vs-komatsu-pc360
MLA
"Kobelco SK350 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison." Suriname Excavators, 10 June 2026, https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/kobelco-sk350-vs-komatsu-pc360.
Chicago
Suriname Excavators. "Kobelco SK350 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison." Accessed 10 June 2026. https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/kobelco-sk350-vs-komatsu-pc360.
BibTeX
@misc{surinameexcavators__compare_kobelco_sk350_vs_komatsu_pc360,
  title = {Kobelco SK350 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison},
  author = {Suriname Excavators},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/kobelco-sk350-vs-komatsu-pc360},
  note = {Accessed: 10 June 2026}
}
Contact to request a price

Need help choosing — SK350 or PC360?

Share your country, project profile, and tonnage requirement. Our team will recommend the right machine and send a tailored quote within one business day.

Email us

Quick quote request

We respond within one business day.

We respond within one business day. No price displayed online — every quote is tailored to your project, tonnage, and delivery country.