Suriname Excavators logo
Suriname Excavators
Side-by-side comparison · medium crawler

Hitachi ZX350LC-7 vs Komatsu PC360

35.3t Hitachi vs 36t Komatsu — full spec showdown, application fit, and our recommendation by project type.

35.3t / 36t
Operating weight
282 / 226 hp
Engine power
1 / 1
Configurations
3 / 3
Applications
Visual comparison

Side-by-side spec bars

Operating weight
ZX350LC-735.3t
PC36036t
Engine power
ZX350LC-7282 hp
PC360226 hp
Max dig depth
ZX350LC-77.38 m
PC3608.00 m
Max reach
ZX350LC-710.85 m
PC36011.50 m
Bucket capacity
ZX350LC-71.15–1.86 m³
PC3601.6 m³

Overview

The Hitachi ZX350LC-7 and Komatsu PC360 sit in the same medium crawler class, separated by less than a tonne of operating weight. Both are positioned in the premium segment, which means the choice between them turns less on brand reputation and more on configuration fit, parts logistics, and operator preference.

Hitachi Construction Machinery ZX350LC-7 buyers across our Caribbean and African service area typically choose it for 35-tonne hitachi flagship heavy. Komatsu PC360 buyers, by contrast, tend to prioritise 36-tonne quarry primary and mining feeder. The two machines have meaningful overlap on quarry primary loading, mining feeder, so a buyer with that application profile genuinely has a choice to make — and it's worth understanding the trade-offs in depth before committing.

Brand positioning

Hitachi Construction Machinery positioning

Hitachi Construction Machinery (HCM) sits a tier above Komatsu and Caterpillar in premium positioning. The HIOS-V hydraulic system delivers the segment's best operator productivity — measurably higher cycle output per litre of fuel.

Komatsu positioning

Komatsu is the segment's fuel-efficiency leader and a close second to Caterpillar on global parts availability. The SAA engine family delivers consistently better real-world fuel consumption than competing premium engines.

5-year total cost of ownership

Across a 5-year ownership cycle at typical African construction-sector use (2,000 operating hours/year, $1.20/L diesel, financed 50%), the Hitachi ZX350LC-7 typically delivers a total 5-year operating cost of $580-650k including acquisition, fuel, parts, service, financing interest, and resale recovery. The Komatsu PC360 comes in at $580-650k.

Acquisition (financed): Hitachi Construction Machinery ZX350LC-7 ~$160-220k, Komatsu PC360 ~$160-220k. Comparable upfront.

Fuel over 5 years: Both machines burn 20-30 L/h on standard duty. Across 10,000 lifetime operating hours that's $240-360k of diesel. The Komatsu PC360 typically delivers 5-10% better real-world fuel economy than competing mid-class machines, saving $12-36k over the cycle.

Parts + service: Premium-tier parts run ~$14-18k/year for the Hitachi ZX350LC-7. Premium-tier parts run ~$14-18k/year for the Komatsu PC360.

Resale at year 5: Hitachi Construction Machinery typically holds 45-55% of acquisition price after 5 years. Komatsu holds 45-55%. The resale gap is often the largest single TCO swing factor — premium-tier machines effectively rebate 15-25% more capital at year five.

Parts logistics & service support

Hitachi Construction Machinery parts logistics for Hitachi ZX350LC-7

Hitachi Construction Machinery direct presence in South Africa, Tanzania, Ghana. Premium dealer support; fast-moving parts within 72-96 hours; major components 2-4 weeks.

Komatsu parts logistics for Komatsu PC360

Komatsu direct dealers across South Africa, Kenya, Tanzania, Ghana, and Nigeria. Strong East African parts logistics in particular. Fast-moving parts within 48-96 hours; major components 2-3 weeks.

What this means in practice

Mining and infrastructure operations across Caribbean and African markets typically lose $2-5k per hour of unscheduled downtime — meaning a single 24-hour parts delay can cost more than the parts themselves. Choose the brand with the strongest parts logistics in your destination country and operating sector.

Configurations available

Hitachi ZX350LC-7 configurations available

  • ZX350LC-7 (standard) — Standard production configuration

Komatsu PC360 configurations available

  • PC360 (standard) — Standard production configuration

Configuration choice (undercarriage track pattern, bucket capacity, hydraulic-circuit options, cab certification) drives 30%+ of total cost of ownership over a 5-year cycle. Whichever model you choose, specify configuration to the buyer's actual operating profile before order — retrofitting later costs 30-50% more.

Specs

Side-by-side spec table

FeatureHitachi ZX350LC-7Komatsu PC360
Operating weight35.3 tonnes36 tonnes
Engine powerIsuzu AP-6HK1X — 210 kW (282 hp)Komatsu SAA6D170E-5 — 226 hp
Bucket capacity1.15–1.86 m³1.6 m³
Max dig depth7.38 m8.00 m
Max reach10.85 m11.50 m
Weight classmedium crawlermedium crawler
Configurations1 variant1 variant
Which to choose

Recommendation by project profile

Applications

Where each model excels

Hitachi ZX350LC-7 applications
  • Quarry primary loading
  • Mining feeder
  • Heavy civil
Komatsu PC360 applications
  • Heavy civil works
  • Quarry primary loading
  • Mining feeder
Availability

Both models available across our service area

Frequently asked

Buyer questions

Which is better — Hitachi ZX350LC-7 or Komatsu PC360?

Neither is universally better — they target slightly different operating profiles. The Hitachi ZX350LC-7 is best for 35-tonne hitachi flagship heavy. The Komatsu PC360 is best for 36-tonne quarry primary and mining feeder. Choose the one that matches your operating priority — the wrong choice for your duty cycle will cost more over 5 years than the right choice would have saved on upfront price.

What's the price difference between the Hitachi ZX350LC-7 and Komatsu PC360?

Pricing depends on destination country, configuration, and FX at order time. Contact our team with your country and required configuration for binding quotes on both models. Typically comparable.

How long does delivery of either to Caribbean and Africa take?

Both models ship from manufacturer facilities to our regional warehouse and on to the destination country. Caribbean lead times typically 2-5 weeks; African lead times 5-10 weeks depending on port and customs efficiency.

Do you offer financing for the Hitachi ZX350LC-7 and Komatsu PC360?

Yes. Both Hitachi Construction Machinery and Komatsu machines can be financed via manufacturer-backed credit programmes (where applicable), regional commercial bank facilities, or lease-to-own structures. Typical terms are 24-60 months. Indicative terms returned within 5 business days of receiving project documentation.

Which holds better resale value — Hitachi ZX350LC-7 or Komatsu PC360?

Comparable resale value retention — both typically hold 45-55% of acquisition price after 5 years.

What configurations should I specify for Hitachi ZX350LC-7 or Komatsu PC360 in mining operations?

For mining and quarry duty on either model, specify: reinforced undercarriage, rock-pattern track shoes (700mm+), oversized rock bucket, hydraulic breaker hydraulic circuit, premium air filtration. Order at point of sale — retrofitting these costs 30-50% more.

Are parts readily available for the Hitachi ZX350LC-7 and Komatsu PC360 across Africa?

Yes — both brands have meaningful African dealer presence. Hitachi fast-moving parts typically 24-72 hours; Komatsu fast-moving parts 24-72 hours. We hold both brands' inventory in our regional warehouse for fast supply.

Can I get an operator trained on the Hitachi ZX350LC-7 or Komatsu PC360?

Yes. Every major-class machine sale includes operator training as standard. Manufacturer-certified training is also available through Hitachi Construction Machinery and Komatsu dealer networks in most major Caribbean and African markets.

Continue comparing

Related head-to-head comparisons

Cite this page
APA
Suriname Excavators. (2026). Hitachi ZX350LC-7 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison. Retrieved 10 June 2026, from https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/hitachi-zx350lc-7-vs-komatsu-pc360
MLA
"Hitachi ZX350LC-7 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison." Suriname Excavators, 10 June 2026, https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/hitachi-zx350lc-7-vs-komatsu-pc360.
Chicago
Suriname Excavators. "Hitachi ZX350LC-7 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison." Accessed 10 June 2026. https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/hitachi-zx350lc-7-vs-komatsu-pc360.
BibTeX
@misc{surinameexcavators__compare_hitachi_zx350lc_7_vs_komatsu_pc360,
  title = {Hitachi ZX350LC-7 vs Komatsu PC360 — Comparison},
  author = {Suriname Excavators},
  year = {2026},
  url = {https://surinameexcavators.com/compare/hitachi-zx350lc-7-vs-komatsu-pc360},
  note = {Accessed: 10 June 2026}
}
Contact to request a price

Need help choosing — ZX350LC-7 or PC360?

Share your country, project profile, and tonnage requirement. Our team will recommend the right machine and send a tailored quote within one business day.

Email us

Quick quote request

We respond within one business day.

We respond within one business day. No price displayed online — every quote is tailored to your project, tonnage, and delivery country.